UCD Surf

Find what matters in the design archive

UCD Coach

Practice brief · UCD methods

Heuristic evaluation is still the fastest UX sanity check

Published 29 August 2026 · Source dated 10 August 2026

Used for: Alpha assumption; Stakeholder brief; Portfolio proof; Method refresh. Practice brief for the gate you are in — not an industry digest dump.

Hype check: Established. Treated as established practice. Source dated 10 August 2026.

Saves the claim and source date (10 August 2026) on this device. No account.

Nielsen Norman Group's usability heuristics remain the baseline method for spotting UX problems fast and cheap. Old doesn't mean irrelevant — it means proven.

No trend claim here — this is squarely **established** practice, and that's the point. NN/g's usability heuristics have been the go-to lightweight evaluation method for decades, and they're still what gets cited in critique sessions and interviews. As a junior designer, you don't need a research budget to use them. Pick any live product (an app on your phone, a website you use weekly) and walk through it against the heuristics list. You'll spot real problems in under an hour, and you'll have a concrete example to talk through in interviews — 'here's a heuristic violation I found and how I'd fix it' is a strong portfolio talking point. This is the kind of method that's genuinely worth memorising properly rather than skimming once.

Coach

Run a 10-heuristic check on one app you use daily and write down two violations with a fix idea for each.

Source: nngroup.com ·

Pair with UCD Coach

Coach is the forward habit — today's five, every morning. Surf is the rearward workbench on the same briefing corpus. Today's five is not restaged here.

Open today's five on UCD Coach

Daily email stays on Coach. Surf has no subscribe form.

More practice briefs on the same topic — not today's five from UCD Coach.